Preview build — content shown here has not yet cleared independent review and is not the public release.

Category · F10-F19 block

F15 — Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of other stimulants, including caffeine

Terminology note: This category includes amphetamine-type stimulants and, distinctively, caffeine — a substance most people use daily without any disorder at all. Its inclusion is a deliberate teaching opportunity, not evidence that ordinary coffee drinking is pathological.

What is this category?

F15's most important teaching point is restraint: because caffeine is included here, this category is the clearest test of whether a learner over-applies the dependence-syndrome framework to any regular substance use rather than checking the actual criteria. Amphetamine-type stimulants otherwise parallel cocaine (F14) closely in intoxication and psychotic-disorder phenomena.

Core diagnostic concept

For amphetamine-type stimulants, the classification approach mirrors F14 closely: distinguish transient intoxication phenomena from a more sustained substance-induced psychotic disorder by timing and persistence. For caffeine specifically, the central question is different and more basic: does a genuine six-criteria dependence cluster exist, or is this simply regular, unproblematic daily use that happens to involve a psychoactive substance?

Key diagnostic features

Acute intoxication phenomena (amphetamine-type)
Euphoria, increased energy, agitation, and sometimes suspiciousness during and shortly after use, closely paralleling cocaine intoxication.
Caffeine intoxication
Restlessness, nervousness, insomnia, and rapid heart rate following notably excessive intake — a real, if rarely clinically significant, ICD-10 state distinct from ordinary caffeine consumption.
Dependence syndrome
The same six-criteria cluster applied to whichever stimulant is used; for caffeine, this is uncommon and requires genuine evidence of control difficulty, tolerance, and continued use despite harm — not simply drinking coffee every morning.
Psychotic disorder (amphetamine-type)
A sustained psychotic picture, closely resembling cocaine-induced psychosis, temporally linked to heavy amphetamine-type stimulant use.
Withdrawal state
For amphetamine-type stimulants, a 'crash' similar to cocaine's; for caffeine, headache, fatigue, and irritability on abruptly stopping regular substantial intake.

How to weigh evidence

These learning labels are teaching aids, not official ICD-10 terminology (see Sources and Method).

  • supports Escalating use of an amphetamine-type stimulant with agitation, paranoia persisting for over a week despite verified abstinence, and clear difficulty controlling use.
  • consistent not decisive The person drinks three cups of coffee every morning and feels tired without it. Regular caffeine use with mild withdrawal-type tiredness alone does not establish dependence syndrome.
  • raises alternative Headache and irritability only on the specific days coffee is skipped, with no difficulty controlling ordinary intake and no harm reported.
  • contradicts or weakens No control difficulty, no escalating use, and no harm from what remains an unremarkable daily caffeine habit.
  • missing and necessary to ask Whether there is any difficulty controlling intake or any harm from the substance use, rather than simply how often it occurs.

Diagnostic boundary

F15's amphetamine-type presentations parallel F14 closely (intoxication versus a more sustained substance-induced psychotic disorder); its caffeine presentations instead test whether the learner distinguishes ordinary regular use from a genuine dependence-syndrome cluster.

Full comparisons:

Duration and course

Minimum duration: Dependence syndrome, as elsewhere in this block, is typically established by three or more criteria present together within the past year — genuinely uncommon for caffeine.

Course: Amphetamine-type stimulant intoxication and psychotic-disorder timing closely parallel cocaine's; caffeine intoxication and withdrawal are both typically brief, resolving within a day or so.

Why this matters For caffeine specifically, course is less the decisive factor than whether the fuller dependence criteria (not just a mild withdrawal headache) are actually present.

Included presentations

  • Transient amphetamine-type stimulant intoxication with euphoria and agitation, resolving as expected.
  • A pattern meeting three or more dependence-syndrome criteria for any stimulant covered by this category, including the uncommon case of genuine caffeine dependence.
  • Caffeine intoxication following notably excessive intake.

Exclusions and distinguishing presentations

Exclusions and where they point instead
If this is true instead…ConsiderWhy
A comparable stimulant-intoxication and psychotic-disorder pattern where the substance is cocaine specifically F14-VS-F15 Cocaine is classified under its own separate category despite pharmacological similarity to other stimulants.
Psychotic symptoms persisting well beyond verified abstinence, or with a strong family/personal history of psychotic illness independent psychiatric illness capsule As with cocaine, an amphetamine-type stimulant can precipitate or coincide with an independent psychotic illness rather than fully account for it.

Four-character subtypes (orientation)

A learner should not classify ordinary daily caffeine use as dependence syndrome or intoxication without genuine evidence of the full criteria or notably excessive intake respectively. Subtypes beyond F15.0 and F15.2 are taught here for orientation only and are not separately assessed in this pilot.

F15.0 — Acute intoxication
Euphoria and agitation (amphetamine-type) or restlessness and rapid heart rate (caffeine) during and shortly after use. (in_depth)
F15.1 — Harmful use
A pattern causing demonstrable harm without the fuller dependence cluster. (taught for orientation only, not separately assessed in this pilot)
F15.2 — Dependence syndrome
Three or more of the six dependence criteria present together within the past year — genuinely uncommon for caffeine specifically. (in_depth)
F15.3 — Withdrawal state
A post-use 'crash' (amphetamine-type) or headache/fatigue/irritability (caffeine) on stopping regular substantial intake. (taught for orientation only, not separately assessed in this pilot)
F15.4 — Withdrawal state with delirium
Rare with this category's substances. (taught for orientation only, not separately assessed in this pilot)
F15.5 — Psychotic disorder
A sustained psychotic picture temporally linked to heavy amphetamine-type stimulant use, closely paralleling cocaine. (taught for orientation only, not separately assessed in this pilot)
F15.6 — Amnesic syndrome
Chronic memory impairment associated with sustained use — rare with this category's substances. (taught for orientation only, not separately assessed in this pilot)
F15.7 — Residual and late-onset psychotic disorder
Stimulant-related changes persisting beyond the period of direct action. (taught for orientation only, not separately assessed in this pilot)
F15.8 — Other mental and behavioural disorders
A stimulant-related presentation not fitting the other listed states. (taught for orientation only, not separately assessed in this pilot)
F15.9 — Unspecified mental and behavioural disorder
A stimulant-related disturbance identified but without enough information to classify further. (taught for orientation only, not separately assessed in this pilot)

External causes to check first

Categories in this block require that the disturbance is not better explained by another external cause listed below. These short capsules are reminders, not full teaching modules.

External cause capsule — Considering an independent psychiatric illness

A reminder that a psychotic (or other psychiatric) presentation occurring alongside substance use should not automatically be assumed substance-induced — an independent illness should be actively considered when the evidence points that way, before settling for an F1x subtype as the final answer.

What to check:

  • Persistence: has the presentation continued essentially unchanged well beyond that substance's expected substance-induced resolution window despite confirmed abstinence, rather than gradually resolving?
  • Trajectory: is the picture static or worsening despite abstinence, rather than the gradual improvement typically expected of a resolving substance-induced disorder?
  • History: is there a personal or family history of psychotic or other psychiatric illness that would raise the prior likelihood of an independent illness?
  • Onset: did any psychiatric symptoms clearly predate the substance use in question, which would argue against a purely substance-induced explanation?

A full differential workup distinguishing a resolving substance-induced disorder from an emerging independent illness, which requires assessment beyond what a single vignette can establish — the honest classification-reasoning answer is often "consider an independent illness" rather than a fully certain diagnosis in either direction.

Common learner errors

Worked example — ordinary caffeine use versus dependence syndrome

A 33-year-old drinks two cups of coffee every morning, has done so for years, and reports a mild headache on the rare day she skips it, which resolves once she has a cup later that day. She has never tried to cut down, has no difficulty controlling her intake, and reports no harm of any kind from her coffee habit. She specifically asks whether this means she is "dependent on caffeine."

  1. Step 1 — Check for control difficulty: she reports no difficulty controlling her intake and has never needed or wanted to cut down.
  2. Step 2 — Check for tolerance: no mention of escalating amounts needed for the same effect over the years.
  3. Step 3 — Check for harm: she reports no harm of any kind — physical, social, or occupational — from her coffee habit.
  4. Step 4 — Weigh the mild withdrawal-type headache alone: an occasional mild headache resolved by a cup of coffee is a minor physiological accompaniment, not evidence of the fuller dependence cluster by itself.
  5. Conclusion — This is best understood as ordinary, unproblematic caffeine use, not dependence syndrome (F15.2), because only a single, mild criterion is present and none of the others — control difficulty, tolerance, neglect of alternatives, or harm despite continued use — are met.

Interactive practice

Retrieval prompts

Try answering each of these from memory before revealing where to check. Nothing you think or type here is sent or saved anywhere.

  1. Without looking back at the page, state why caffeine's inclusion in this category is a deliberate teaching point rather than a claim that coffee drinking is a disorder.

    Reveal answer location

    Check Duration and course, Diagnostic boundary, or the rapid revision card below — the cue you need is one of those, in this category's own already-authored wording.

  2. Name the feature that most distinguishes ordinary regular caffeine use from caffeine dependence syndrome.

    Reveal answer location

    Check Duration and course, Diagnostic boundary, or the rapid revision card below — the cue you need is one of those, in this category's own already-authored wording.

  3. Explain in one sentence how amphetamine-type stimulant intoxication and psychosis parallel cocaine's.

    Reveal answer location

    Check Duration and course, Diagnostic boundary, or the rapid revision card below — the cue you need is one of those, in this category's own already-authored wording.

These self-checks are a personal study aid only, visible to you on this page for this visit — they are not stored and do not affect your mastery dimensions.

Rapid revision card

F15: Amphetamine-type stimulants parallel cocaine's intoxication/psychotic-disorder boundary closely; caffeine's inclusion tests whether ordinary daily use is mistaken for dependence syndrome.

Decisive boundary cues:

  • Control difficulty, tolerance and harm all present -> weighs toward genuine dependence syndrome, even for caffeine.
  • A mild withdrawal-type symptom alone, with no control difficulty or harm -> weighs toward ordinary use, not dependence.
  • Sustained psychotic picture persisting beyond intoxication -> consider F15.5, paralleling F14's reasoning.

Duration/course: Caffeine intoxication and withdrawal are both typically brief, resolving within about a day.

Nearest alternatives: F14

Common mistake: Assuming any regular use of a stimulant, including caffeine, is itself evidence of dependence.

Retrieval prompt: What single question would you ask first about whether this person has ever had difficulty controlling their intake?

Related glossary terms

  • Dependence syndrome

    A cluster of behavioural, cognitive, and physiological phenomena that develop after repeated substance use, in which use of that substance takes on a much higher priority than other behaviours that once had greater value. Classically established when three or more of six criteria (strong desire/compulsion, difficulty controlling use, tolerance, a physiological withdrawal state, progressive neglect of alternative interests, and continued use despite clear harm) have been present together within the past year.

    Open full glossary entry →

  • Tolerance

    A state in which increasing amounts of a substance are needed to achieve the effects originally produced by a lower amount, or in which continued use of the same amount produces a markedly diminished effect. One of the six criteria contributing to a dependence-syndrome classification.

    Open full glossary entry →

Source basis

WHO ICD-10 international classification structure and code/title (ICD-10 Browser, 2019 English release).

Original educational synthesis, informed by general published clinical-education understanding of ICD-10 F15; no verbatim CDDG or DCR text is reproduced. See Sources and Method for the full policy.

Last reviewed: 2026-09-15. Full policy: Sources and Method.

Educational resource only. This page and its cases teach ICD-10 classification reasoning using fictional scenarios. It does not diagnose real people and should not be used to assess yourself or anyone else.

↑ Return to top