Preview build — content shown here has not yet cleared independent review and is not the public release.

F95 vs F98

F98.4 — Stereotyped movement disorders

Distinguish a tic (F95) from a stereotyped movement (F98.4), using the character of the movement — sudden, rapid, non-rhythmic, and involuntary versus rhythmic, sustained, and voluntary-seeming — rather than the movement's severity or social visibility.

This is just for your own thinking. It is never submitted, sent, or stored anywhere — it disappears the moment you leave or reload this page.

(or open each item below individually)
Show overlap — what both share

Both tics and stereotyped movements are repetitive, non-purposeful-looking movements that can appear in the same age group and can both be exacerbated by stress or excitement, so surface repetitiveness alone does not distinguish them.

Show decisive evidence
  • F95 tics are sudden, rapid, and non-rhythmic, experienced as involuntary though they can often be suppressed briefly with effort, and characteristically diminish during absorbing activity and disappear during sleep.
  • F98.4 stereotyped movements are rhythmic, sustained, and often self-soothing (such as body-rocking or head-banging), appearing more voluntary in character and not sharing a tic's sudden, non-rhythmic quality.
  • A movement that is abrupt, brief, and non-rhythmic, worse with stress and absent in sleep, favours F95.
  • A movement that is rhythmic, sustained over a longer period, and appears to serve a self-soothing function favours F98.4.

What weakens F95: A rhythmic, sustained, voluntary-seeming quality weakens F95 in favour of F98.4; a sudden, non-rhythmic, suppressible-but-involuntary quality weakens F98.4 in favour of F95.

Show duration / course

F95's fourth character is decided partly by duration (under versus at least 12 months) together with type (motor, vocal, or combined); F98.4 instead requires a persistent, not transient, rhythmic pattern without the same duration-based subdivision.

Show exclusions / context

Per each category's own exclusions_distinctions entries, a genuinely tic-like presentation (sudden, non-rhythmic, involuntary) is directed to F95 rather than F98.4, and a rhythmic, sustained, voluntary-seeming pattern is directed to F98.4 rather than F95.

Show information still needed

Whether the movement's character is sudden and non-rhythmic (favouring F95) or rhythmic and sustained (favouring F98.4), independent of how severe or socially noticeable it is.

Show the common trap

Classifying any repetitive childhood movement as a tic without checking whether its rhythmic, sustained, self-soothing character actually fits a stereotyped movement disorder instead.

If you see this, think harder about the boundary Classifying any repetitive childhood movement as a tic without checking whether its rhythmic, sustained, self-soothing character actually fits a stereotyped movement disorder instead. Before settling on F95, check specifically for: Whether the movement's character is sudden and non-rhythmic (favouring F95) or rhythmic and sustained (favouring F98.4), independent of how severe or socially noticeable it is.

Mini challenge — practise this distinction

Apply the discriminating evidence above to a fresh case before checking the full feedback.

← All comparisons in this block